Legal Opinion
Lenz v. Chalamidas
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1991No. 19625PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
This appeal calls on us to consider once again the trial court’s award of attorney fees pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 48-2-14 (Repl.Pamp.1987). The original action underlying this appeal was for foreclosure on a residence pursuant to a materialmen’s lien. The plaintiff, contractor Lenz, prevailed and was awarded damages of $13,-364.82 and attorney fees in the amount of $26,268.03. We considered that initial award of attorney fees in Lenz v. Chalamidas, 109 N.M. 113, 782 P.2d 85 (1989) (Lenz I), and found it necessary to remand for a new trial on attorney fees in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson Drilling, Inc. v. RomigNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Lenz v. ChalamidasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Ulibarri v. GeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Montgomery v. KaravasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Ulibarri v. GeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by20 opinions
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jaramillo v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Buckingham v. RyanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Credit Institute v. Veterinary Nutrition Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.