Legal Opinion

Government of Guam Ex Rel. Carlos G. Camacho and G. Ricardo Salas, Carlos G. Camacho and G. Ricardo Salas v. Horace v. Bird

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1968No. 21503PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIGEL, District Judge;

Appellants are citizens and taxpayers of the Territory of Guam purporting to act on behalf of the government of Guam. When this action was instituted in the District Court of the Territory, appellee was Commander, Naval Forces, Marianas. In that capacity, he imported alcoholic beverages for use within military reservations in Guam. The importation was pursuant to Department of Defense Regulations promulgated under section 6 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C. App. § 473 (1964).

Appellants contend that the importation was contrary to the laws of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Reynolds v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. G. Ricardo Salas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Ritchhart v. DaubNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Island Equipment Land Co., a Corporation, and Pacific Retread, Inc., a Corporation v. Guam Economic Development Authority, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API