Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Consolidated Car Heating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Suit in equity by the Safety Car Heating & Righting- Company against the Consolidated Car Heating Company. Decree for defendant (160 Red. 476), and complainant appeals.
1Per curiam
The patent to Searle relates to that class of circulatory heating systems in which a liquid, after being heated and *659freed of air and steam, may be employed for warming railway cars; the heat being derived from a main source, preferably a steam boiler.
Be employs a circulatory system, which includes a heat-radiating portion with an ascending pipe on one side thereof and a descending pipe on the other, a heater located at substantially the lowest point of the circuit, and means for transferring heat derived from a main source into operative contact with the circulating liquid in the heater. Tn…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Frank F. Smith Hardware Co. v. S. H. Pomeroy Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Dock & Terminal Engineering Co. v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
- Mead Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Exeter Mach. WorksDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
- Jost v. Borden Stove Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
- SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.