Legal Opinion
Groten v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2001No. 99-56475PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Stuart Groten appeals the district court’s dismissal of his amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Groten brought his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 12 U.S.C. § 3351 against the State of California and state officials in the Office of Real Estate Appraisers. Groten alleges that the appellees violated his constitutional rights when they denied him the opportunity to apply for a temporary real estate appraiser’s license and a reciprocal real estate appraiser’s license and delayed the issuance of his permanent license. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Montanez v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Gerhart v. Lake County, Mont.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Groten v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Davis v. PowellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.