Legal Opinion

State v. Pulkrabek

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2017No. 20160332PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Robert Pulkrabek appealed the district court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of theft of property. Pulkrabek argued the district court erred when it did not tell the jury it had to unanimously agree on which theory of theft it believed he committed beyond a reasonable doubt, We affirm.

I

[¶2] In September 2014, sports memorabilia were taken from a trailer. A search warrant was issued for Robert Pulkrabek’s property in July 2015. During the execution of the search warrant, some of - the stolen sports memorabilia were found in Pulkrabek’s truck, Pulkrabek…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. BourbeauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. CarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. MathreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. KollieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. TompkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Nyynkpao Banyee v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
  5. State v. KrallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API