Legal Opinion

Lee v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 28, 1997No. Record 961029PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal of a civil action for forfeiture initiated pursuant to Code § 18.2-249, we consider whether there is a “substantial connection” between the forfeited items and illegal drug activity. ■

The Commonwealth initiated this proceeding by filing an information for forfeiture against Herbert Lee, Pamela Denise Montague, $2,881 in United States currency, and a 1987 Nissan Pathfinder. The Commonwealth alleged that the currency and the vehicle were items “used in substantial connection with or exchanged for, or traceable to an exchange for . . . cocaine.” Lee and his sister, Montague,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. $95,945.18, United States Currency, Appeal of Carlton Lee BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. SchifferliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Two Tracts of Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Thereto, Located in Carteret CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
  2. Powell v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Powell v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  4. Ricky DeWayne Rogers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API