Legal Opinion

Rankin v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action under section 109 of the Insurance Law to enforce liability under a liability policy issued by the defendant to one of its assured, against whom plaintiff obtained a judgment. Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer and grant summary judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The language in the limits of liability clause relating to coverage clause, labeled “ Coverage A,” effectively limits liability to $5,000 “ for all damages arising out of bodily injury * * * of one person.” Here, in the City Court action the defendant has paid $2,500 to the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. CassidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Champagne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Bernat v. SockeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Wilson v. Capital Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API