Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Quarterman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2006No. 03-11097PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:

This appeal raises questions concerning whether a petitioner is entitled to a new sentencing hearing for capital murder based on the Supreme Court’s Penry line of cases,1 whose purpose is to afford effective jury consideration of evidence mitigating a defendant’s moral culpability. The district court granted COA on this sole issue, after rejecting the others petitioner raised. After careful review, we conclude that Garcia has failed to meet the standards governing habeas relief under AED-PA.

I. Background

Around 2:00 a.m. on Sunday, August 30, 1987, Debbie Rodriguez…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Avila v. QuartermanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  3. Nelson v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. Garcia v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Nelson v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API