Legal Opinion

Brandon-Wiant Company v. Teamor

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1999No. 76334PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy E. McMonagle, Presiding Judge.

This cause came on to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 25, the records from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, the briefs, and the oral arguments of counsel. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusory decision. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 158, 158-159, 11 OBR 240, 241, 463 N.E.2d 655, 656.

Plaintiff-appellant, the Brandon/Wiant Company, appeals the decision entered in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. BrandenburgOhio Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. National City Mortgage Co. v. WellmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Estate of Shury v. CusatoOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Cuspide Properties, Ltd. v. Earl Mechanical Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API