Legal Opinion

Arminski v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1970No. Docket 6,772PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

Defendant issued plaintiff Dr. Thomas Arminski a family automobile insurance policy which covered two automobiles. The policy provided for family protection and uninsured motorist coverage. The policy states under limits of liability:

“The limit of bodily injury liability stated in the declarations as applicable to ‘each person’ is the limit of the company’s liability for all damages, in- eluding damages for care and loss of services, arising out of bodily injury sustained by one person as the result of any one occurrence; the limit of such liability stated in the declarations as applicable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  2. Smith v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Polland v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Horr v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Talbot v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Collins v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. McHughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Kozak v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API