Legal Opinion
Arminski v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1970No. Docket 6,772PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.
Defendant issued plaintiff Dr. Thomas Arminski a family automobile insurance policy which covered two automobiles. The policy provided for family protection and uninsured motorist coverage. The policy states under limits of liability:
“The limit of bodily injury liability stated in the declarations as applicable to ‘each person’ is the limit of the company’s liability for all damages, in- eluding damages for care and loss of services, arising out of bodily injury sustained by one person as the result of any one occurrence; the limit of such liability stated in the declarations as applicable to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Smith v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Polland v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Horr v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by19 opinions
- Talbot v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1974
- Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Collins v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. McHughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Kozak v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.