Jackson, Morris & Co. v. Rutherford
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. John Henderson. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSomeryille, J.
— The action is one of detinue brought by appellants against the appellee for certain personal chattels. The plaintiffs claimed title under a verbal or parol mortgage, by which the defendant stipulated that the property' “should stand good for his indebtedness” to them, which is shown to have been something over the sum of three hundred dollars. There was no change in the possession of the chattels by delivery, they still remaining in the hands of the defendant. The court charged the jury that the legal' title did not pass to the plaintiffs under the agreement, and that no recovery could be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Donald & Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Fletcher v. MoreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1843
- Newlin, Fernley & Co. v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Gafford v. StearnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Ellington v. CharlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Alabama State Bank v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Campbell v. Woodstock Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Barnhill v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Jones v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.