Legal Opinion

State v. Zuzga

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2001No. Case No. 99 CA 97PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vukovtch, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant Stephen Zuzga appeals the decision of the Youngstown Municipal Court that denied his motion to suppress the results of a blood test. Appellant argues that the court should have suppressed the blood-test results because the blood was not treated with an anticoagulant and there was no evidence of the temperature of the refrigerator in which the blood was stored. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant was involved in an automobile accident on October 7, 1998. He was transported to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Mason v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. McKinnonOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Mason v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. O'NeillOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. ScurtiOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API