Legal Opinion

People v. Farley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1951No. 31762PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

Petitioner, Robert C. Farley, hereafter referred to as defendant, filed a petition purporting to be authorized by the statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, chap. 38, par. 826,) commonly known as the Post-Conviction Act, in the criminal court of Cook County, claiming that he had been denied certain constitutional rights, and prays that a judgment of conviction rendered against him be vacated, and that he be allowed a new trial. Upon a hearing the criminal court denied the petition of defendant, and thereupon he filed and was allowed a writ of error to this court.

The petition briefly sets forth that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The People v. MeisenhelterIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. The People v. UtterbackIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Weyrich v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People v. ManiatisIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. The People v. StillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. The People v. MoriarityIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. The PEOPLE v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. The PEOPLE v. VailIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API