Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. Ada County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 2007No. 06-35509PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner-Appellant Richard W. Hoyle was indicted in Idaho on state racketeering charges. By the time the case was submitted to the jury, two counts remained in addition to thirty alleged predicate acts for a third count involving a racketeering charge (“Count B”). After the jury told the trial judge that it could not agree on a number of predicate acts in Count B, the trial judge instructed the jury to note on a special verdict form where there was no agreement. The jury returned a not guilty verdict on the racketeering counts, but wrote “no agmt” next to seven…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. EgglestonWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Silva v. McDonaldDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Robert Farmer v. E.K. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Abrams v. SchaeferDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  5. Adrian G Sassen Van Elsloo v. Whatcom County, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API