Legal Opinion

Philyaw v. Platinum Enterprises, Inc.

Spotsylvania County Circuit Court

Decided January 9, 2001No. Case No. CL00-236PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge William H. Ledbetter, Jr.

In a pretrial motion, two of three defendants ask the court to compel arbitration under the parties’ written warranty agreement. In response, the plaintiffs argue that the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, applicable here, precludes binding arbitration. Further, they argue that this particular arbitration provision is unenforceable because it is unconscionable. The court agrees with the plaintiffs on both grounds.

Facts

For the limited purpose of this motion, the parties agree that the court may look to the pleadings for the pertinent facts.

The plaintiffs (Philyaws)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. ArdSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Wilson v. Waverlee Homes, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  5. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Senture, llC v. DietrichDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  2. Bennett v. Dillard's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  3. Bramow v. Toll VA, L.P.Loudoun County Circuit Court · 2005
  4. Sanders v. Certified Car Center, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 2016
  5. Newman v. L & H Co.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API