Legal Opinion
Guy v. Rolvaag
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1964No. Civ. No. 3-64-21PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
The case at bar came on for hearing at St. Paul, Minnesota, before a statutory court of three judges. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and judgment. The pending motions will be disposed of before determination on the merits.
Plaintiffs’ motion for permission to file a second amended complaint is granted.
It is so ordered.
Defendants Karl F. Rolvaag and Walter F. Mondale have each moved for dismissal of the action as to them.
Said motions to dismiss may be and the same are hereby granted.
It is so ordered.
The defendants have moved the court to abstain from a decision of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joe Louis Milk Co. v. HersheyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- Joe Louis Milk Company v. HersheyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1969