Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Pacific Marine Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1917No. 13978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered August 4, 1916, in favor of the plaintiffs upon the pleadings, in an action on a marine insurance policy.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover upon a marine insurance policy for the loss of a boat by fire. After the issues had been made up by the second amended complaint —which will be referred to as the complaint—the answer, and the reply, the plaintiffs made a motion for judgment upon the pleadings. This motion was sustained, and judgment entered for the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,052. The defendant appeals.

The facts stated in the pleadings which present the controlling question upon this appeal may be stated as follows; On April 23, 1915, the respondents, being the owners of a certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Port Blakely Mill Co. v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Johnson v. Franklin InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England International Assurety of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1991
  2. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. of Baltimore v. BilquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Glant v. Lloyd's Register of ShippingWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Highlands Insurance v. KoetjeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1987
  5. Van Meter v. Franklin Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API