Legal Opinion
State v. Ramey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 14, 2006No. A04-1056Published
1Opinion of the Court
721 N.W.2d 294 (2006)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Scott Wade RAMEY, Respondent.
No. A04-1056.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
September 14, 2006.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, James B. Early, Asst. Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Douglas L. Ruth, Steele County Attorney, Owatonna, MN, for Appellant.
Davi E. Axelson, Office of the State Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
This appeal arises from a jury trial in which respondent, Scott Wade Ramey, was found guilty of violating an order for protection. The court of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.