Legal Opinion

Protect The Peninsula's Future v. City Of Port Angeles

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 19, 2013No. 43252-8Published

1Opinion of the Court

FJLID COUR OF APPEALS DI VISIDt'4 IT 2013 JUN 19 AM 8: 32 S M IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHING] 11 Y DIVISION II PROTECT THE PENINSULA'S FUTURE, No. 43252 8 II - - CLALLAM COUNTY CITIZENS FOR SAFE DRINKING WATER, and ELOISE KAILIN, Appellants Cross - / Respondents, u CITY OF PORT ANGELES, and CITY OF FORKS, PUBLISHED OPINION isCross A / - WORSWICK, C. . — J Protect the Peninsula's Future, Clallam County Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, and Eloise Kailin ( ollectively, Kailin)filed a complaint for a search.warrant c under RCW 69. 1.claiming that fluoride is a legend drug and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API