Deuschle v. State

ON STATE’S motion for rehearing.

MARTIN, Judge.

In our original opinion we reluctantly followed the case of Ball v. State, 25 S. W. 627, which was inter preted by us to mean that a public road running through a homestead was a part of the premises, as that word is used in Art. 484 of the Penal Code, so that a person in possession of same charged with unlawfully carrying a pistol came within one of the exemptions named in said article. The facts of the Ball case are meager ly stated and perhaps a fuller statement might disclose that it is not out of line with what, upon fuller consideration, we…