Waddell v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Houston. Tried below before the Hon. L. W. Cooper. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion and headnote.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
We are authorized to presume that by the act of April 12th, 1871, entitled “ An act to regulate the keeping “ and bearing of deadly weapons,” the Legislature intended to suppress the absurd and vicious practice of bearing upon the person such weapons as pistols, dirks, daggers, slung-shots, sword-canes, spears, brass-knuckles, and bowie knives. But we find nothing in the act which, rightly construed, takes away any right or abridges any reasonable and lawful privilege of the citizen. But if wrong constructions are placed upon this act, and absurd and vexatious prosecutions for acts not within…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Birch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- Pyka v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Inzer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Lebman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.