Riverside Syndicate, Inc. v. Saltzman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Landlord failed to “complete” service of the notice of petitions and petitions by filing proof of service (RPAPL 735 [2] [b]) at least five days prior to the date the petitions were noticed to be heard (see RPAPL 733 [1]). A summary proceeding is a special proceeding “governed entirely by statute . . . and it is well established that there must be strict compliance with the statutory requirements to give the court jurisdiction” (Berkeley Assoc. Co. v Di Nolfi, 122 AD2d 703, 705 [1986], lv dismissed 69 NY2d 804 [1987]; MSG Pomp Corp. v Doe, 185 AD2d 798 [1992]). Thus, the court should have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. Di NolfiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Siedlecki v. DoscherAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011
- Bank of America, N.A. v. OwensRochester City Court · 2010
- Redzep Djokic v. PerezCivil Court of the City of New York · 2008
- Crosby v. CrossettNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Jaikarran & Sons, Inc. v. BeechamAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.