Legal Opinion

Moody v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 2, 1997No. 90014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

699 So.2d 1009 (1997)

Kenneth Harold MOODY, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 90014.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 2, 1997.

Kenneth Harold Moody, Blountstown, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review Moody v. State, 696 So.2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with decisions of the Third and Fourth District Courts of Appeal. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We quash the decision below and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Cullen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Moody v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. New v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Newell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Winchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Robbins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API