Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Staten

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1986No. 3048PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

In a per curiam order the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on June 21, 1985, 508 Pa. 77, 494 A.2d 1049, remanded this case to us “for consideration of the merits of the double jeopardy issue in view of” Commonwealth v. Zoller, 507 Pa. 344, 490 A.2d 394 (1985). We must now determine whether the lower court’s grant of a demurrer was proper.

A demurrer to the evidence requires a court to accept as true the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and view that evidence, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom, in a light most favorable to the Commonwealth; then determine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. ZollerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. SmalisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. Barnett, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1989
  4. Commonwealth v. StatenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. StatenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API