Legal Opinion

Clarissa Marsh v. Gloria Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1986No. 84-1777PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Clarissa Marsh appeals from an order of the district court denying her petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which she alleged that her convictions for felony murder and assault with intent to murder were not supported by sufficient evidence and that introduction of the statement of her non-testifying co-defendant violated her right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Finding that the convictions were obtained in violation of the Constitution, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to grant the writ. 1

I

Petitioner…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Clarissa Marsh v. Gloria RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Benjamin Matthew Logan, Also Known as Matt LoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API