Hengst v. Burnett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Petition by Bates B. Burnett, as guardian, etc., for an order to sell certain property, and from the judgment Charles Augustus Hengst, etc., brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On January 7, 1911, pursuant to the prayer of the petition of Bates B. Burnett, as guardian of Charles Augustus Iiengst, the county court of Creek county appointed three appraisers who appraised certain property at $7,'200, whereupon the court entered' an order authorizing said guardian to invest that amount of the funds of the ward in the purchase of said property, consisting of block 9 in Burnett’s addition to the city of Sapulpa in Creek county, which was done 'and the purchase approved. On January 14, 1911, came William C. Hengst, as father and next friend of said minor and a person…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Gold v. Vermont Central Rail RoadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Stowell v. OverseersNew York Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradburn v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Mayo v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Berryhill v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918