Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance v. Roadarmel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2000No. 99-552Published

1Opinion of the Court

11 P.3d 105 (2000)

2000 MT 259

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner and Respondent,

v.

Earl W. ROADARMEL and Donald E. White, Respondents and Appellants.

No. 99-552.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs March 16, 2000.

Decided September 28, 2000.

Karl P. Seel, Bozeman, Montana (White); Earl W. Roadarmel, Townsend, Montana (pro se), For Appellant.

James G. Edmiston, Edmiston & Schernerhorn, Billings, Montana, For Respondent.

Justice WILLIAM E. HUNT, Sr. delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 The Royal Insurance Company ("Royal") initiated this subrogation action against Earl W. Roadarmel…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rideaux v. TorgrimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Heisler v. Hines Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API