Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mitchell v. Ankney

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1986No. 15149Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

(specially concurring).

In registering my concurrence herein, reference is made to my dissent in Mortenson v. Braley, 349 N.W.2d 444, 446 (S.D.1984).

In said dissent, I set forth Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (1965), and quoted as follows:

A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm caused to his invitees by a condition on the land if, but only if, he(a) knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees, and(b) should expect that they will not discover or realize the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. McCormick v. WatersTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hanson v. Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Crotty v. Eeading Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API