Legal Opinion

People v. Huggins

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The disclosure of an informer’s identity at suppression hearings is a matter left to the sound but reviewable discretion of the hearing court. In People v Darden (34 NY2d 177) recognizing the delicacy of the task, we furnished certain guidelines to assist the courts in exercising their discretionary powers in conducting suppression hearings to hold in camera inquiries as to the existence of an informer and with respect to the communications made by the informer to the police. In the present case, though requested, such an inquiry was denied. In the circumstances disclosed in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. AdrionNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. CarpenitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. People v. SingletaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API