Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaye v. Whalen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1977Published

1Dissent

Kane, J. P. (dissenting).

Although diplomatically called the establishment of a "tentative” rate by the majority, in plain words and fact the respondents simply froze 1976 Medicaid reimbursement rates at existing 1975 levels. This the majority says they were permitted to do by section 2808 of the Public Health Law. We disagree. It also concludes that chapter 76 of the Laws of 1976 authorized their later action in fixing new rates for 1976 retroactively and that such action neither impaired any contractual rights nor offended relevant Federal statutes and regulations. Again we disagree. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Lakeland Water District v. Onondaga County Water AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Mulligan v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API