Legal Opinion

City of Piqua v. Ohio Farmers Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1992No. 92-CA-18PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Ohio Farmers Insurance Company appeals from the order of the trial court referring this case to arbitration. The trial court found that Ohio Farmers, as surety, was bound by an arbitration provision in the general contract between its principal, Hughes-Bechtol, Inc., and the city of Piqua. For the reasons stated below, we overrule the assignment of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

On April 25, 1986, Hughes-Bechtol entered into the primary contract with Piqua for installation of a district steam-heating distribution system. That contract contained an arbitration clause,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teramar Corp. v. Rodier Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Windowmaster Corp. v. B. G. Danis Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McGuffey v. Lenscrafters, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. St. Vincent Charity Hospital v. URS Consultants, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Kline v. Oak Ridge Builders, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Matson, Inc. v. Lamb & Associates Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Union Township v. Union Township Professional Firefighters' Local 3412Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API