Legal Opinion
Whitworth v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1961No. 321PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the District Court dismissing his claim for workmen’s compensation on an exception of no cause of action, without any pleading amendment or formal trial on the merits. In his petition Plaintiff alleged, inter alia:
*585That he was employed by Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. approximately Syí years; that for several months prior to July 19, 1957, he had been working constantly under conditions wherein he was exposed to constant and incessant loud noises; that notwithstanding he had requested a transfer to a department where it was more quiet, he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Marie v. Standard Steel WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Lampkin v. Kent Piling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Glover v. Fidelity Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Stokes v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pickett v. Stine Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hargrave v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Chatelain v. American Can Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Penton v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961