Jensen v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 57, Jan. T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1917, No. 4025, affirming order of Workmen’s Compensation Board, allowing claim, in case of Sorine P. Jensen v. The Atlantic Refining Company. Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Board. Before Monaghan, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the appeal. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moschzisker,
In accordance with Sec. 410, Act of June 2,1915, P. L. 736, 751, plaintiff, widow of Charles Jensen, entered into a compensation agreement with the Atlantic Refining Company, in whose service her husband had been accidentally killed, whereby the weekly payments due her, as a dependent, were ascertained in a stipulated manner. Subsequently, plaintiff sought to have the agreement in question revised, alleging that “the computation [of compensation] was based upon an incorrect standard of wages of deceased.” The board revised the agreement accordingly; and, on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Romig v. Champion Blower & Forge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- O'Donnell v. S. Fayette Twp. School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Rakie v. Jefferson & Clearfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Ware v. Northern Metal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.