State v. Givens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*121 Where defendant has not met his burden to show that defense counsel was deficient by not fulfilling a promise made to the jury in his opening statement, defendant was not prejudiced and is not entitled to a new trial.
Arthur Lee Givens, defendant, and Donald Everette Gist, the victim, became acquainted in the fall of 2014 while they both stayed at Schameka Earl's home for a few weeks. At *44 first, Gist got along well with both Earl and defendant. After a few weeks, however, both Earl and defendant began having issues with Gist. Defendant, who testified at trial, said Gist began…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- United States v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. HarbisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021