Legal Opinion

State v. Givens

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 2016No. 15-710PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*121 Where defendant has not met his burden to show that defense counsel was deficient by not fulfilling a promise made to the jury in his opening statement, defendant was not prejudiced and is not entitled to a new trial.

Arthur Lee Givens, defendant, and Donald Everette Gist, the victim, became acquainted in the fall of 2014 while they both stayed at Schameka Earl's home for a few weeks. At *44 first, Gist got along well with both Earl and defendant. After a few weeks, however, both Earl and defendant began having issues with Gist. Defendant, who testified at trial, said Gist began…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. United States v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. HarbisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API