Legal Opinion

State v. Burton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 2017No. COA16-343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

This case presents the issues of whether (1) the State must affirmatively prove that a vehicle was "readily mobile" in order for the "automobile exception" to permit a warrantless search under the Fourth Amendment; and (2) Miranda warnings are required before a law enforcement officer may read aloud the charges against two arrestees in each other's presence. Kendrick Tarrell Burton ("Defendant") appeals from his conviction of felony possession of cocaine. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in admitting both the cocaine discovered as the result *67 of a search of his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  2. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API