Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1951No. Crim. 2691PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Defendants Ross King and Kenneth Pierce were found guilty upon two counts of an indictment charging them with abortion and conspiracy to commit abortion. Their motion for a new trial was denied and this appeal is from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Defendants and appellants do not attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgments of conviction, nor do they contend that the jury was not fully, fairly and correctly instructed. They base their argument for reversal upon a number of asserted prejudicial errors…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. GorgolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. People v. TerrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API