Legal Opinion

Bell v. John H. Giles Dyeing Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 7, 1930No. 4114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

The Klauder-Weldon Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, being in bankruptcy, the Giles Dyeing Machine Company presented its claim of $44,515.13. This amount the referee reduced to $16,515.13. On review, the District Court allowed the full amount of the claim. From the court’s order, so made, this appeal is taken.

The controversy arises out of a contract dated August 27, 1918, between the Giles Company and the Klauder-Weldon Dyeing Machine Company, a New York corporation. By this contract, the Giles Company agreed to deliver to the New York company all its property,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Delp v. Bartholomay Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Burger v. Level End Dairy Investors (In Re Burger)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1991
  3. United Advertising Corp. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API