Legal Opinion
Mosner v. Haddock
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
This is a motion made to obtain an order prohibiting the respondent, a City Magistrate of the City of New York sitting in the Municipal Term in Manhattan, from hearing and disposing of charges filed against the petitioner for selling pork products at prices in excess of the ceiling *487prices fixed and determined by the United States Office of Price Administration. It appears that that court was designated by order of the Chief City Magistrate as the tribunal in which the City Magistrates would try such offenses.
The petitioner challenges the jurisdiction of the Municipal Term, asserting it is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Darweger v. StaatsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People v. CitarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Transit Commission v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People ex rel. Dembinsky v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SellMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. MailmanNew York Court of Special Session · 1944
- People v. SchildhausNew York Court of Special Session · 1959
- Butter & Egg Merchants Ass'n v. La GuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Mosner v. HaddockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.