Diane Weil v. Edward Elliott
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrenceChristen, Circuit Judge
I concur in the majority’s judgment and reasoning; 11 U.S.C. § 727(e)(1) is a waiva-ble and non-jurisdictional time bar. I write separately to further explain why I conclude that § 727(e)(1) is a statute of limitations, rather than a statute of repose.
There are “sometimes arcane distinctions” between statutes of limitations and statutes of repose, but the case law in this area is confusing because these limitation periods share many of the same attributes. See Underwood Cotton Co. v. Hyundai Merch. Marine (Am.), Inc., 288 F.3d 405, 409 (9th Cir. 2002). Both set time limits for bringing suits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- CTS Corp. v. WaldburgerSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Edelfo Albillo-De Leon v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Pardo v. Olson & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Blazevska v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.