State v. Durgan
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
VIOLETTE, Justice.
Defendant, Richard Durgan, has appealed from a judgment of conviction entered by the Superior Court, Sagadahoc County, after a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary and theft in violation of 17 — A M.R.S.A. §§ 401 and 353 (1983). He maintains that the evidence produced by the State at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support the convictions. Because we agree with defendant, we sustain the appeal and reverse the judgment entered below.
Initially, we observe that when reviewing a defendant’s challenge to his conviction based on a claim of insufficient…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. MosherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- State v. SabaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- State v. JoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. SapielSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. WilderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Leighton v. Fleet Bank of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State v. DePhilippoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State v. WinchenbachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. LaPlanteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.