Legal Opinion

State v. Durgan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 3, 1983PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

Defendant, Richard Durgan, has appealed from a judgment of conviction entered by the Superior Court, Sagadahoc County, after a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary and theft in violation of 17 — A M.R.S.A. §§ 401 and 353 (1983). He maintains that the evidence produced by the State at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support the convictions. Because we agree with defendant, we sustain the appeal and reverse the judgment entered below.

Initially, we observe that when reviewing a defendant’s challenge to his conviction based on a claim of insufficient…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. MosherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. State v. SabaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  4. State v. JoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. State v. SapielSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. WilderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Leighton v. Fleet Bank of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. State v. DePhilippoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. State v. WinchenbachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. State v. LaPlanteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API