Legal Opinion

Flight Attendants Against Ual Offset (Faauo) and United Air Lines, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 10, 1999No. 97-3151, 97-3335PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, an association of flight attendants employed by United Air Lines, filed suit in the Tax Court under 26 U.S.C. § 7476 seeking a declaration that the Internal Revenue Service had erred in determining that the conversion of United’s retirement savings plan for flight attendants to a 401 (k) plan had no tax consequences. The association wanted the plan terminated rather than converted and the plan’s assets distributed to the flight attendants, and it believed that this would happen if the new plan was denied the favorable tax status that the original plan had…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Mark F. Elmore v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Jay E. Hayden Foundation v. First Neighbor Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Norman Shropshear v. Corporation Counsel of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Rosado v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Ewing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API