Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Robinson
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 30, 1990No. 319, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
The parties to this expedited appeal, pursuant to Rule 8-207, have submitted the following agreed statement of facts.
1. Appellants in the above-captioned case are, and at all relevant times hereinafter mentioned were, eligible persons (as defined by Md.Ann.Code Article 31B, section 1) at the Patuxent Institution.
2. Appellants were approved for work release by the Patuxent Board of Review (hereinafter “Board”) prior to December, 1988, pursuant to the procedures established in Patuxent Institution Regulation (hereinafter “PIR”) 240-11 (September 17, 1987).
3. Subsequent to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Patuxent Institution Board of Review v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Committee for Responsible Development on 25th Street v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Branch v. McGeeneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Alston v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.