Legal Opinion

Spradling v. Hudson, District Judge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1915No. 5590PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original proceeding for writ of prohibition by S. S. Sprawling against R. II. Hudson, Judge of tire District Court of Osage Count}', Olda.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

On tlre¡ 10th day of March, 1913, Nannie Spradling filed her petition, in the district court of Osage county, Olda., against the petitioner, S. S. Spradling, a& defendant, alleging that she had theretofore, on the - day of -, 19 — ■, obtained a decree of divorce in the Wolf circuit court of Kentucky, -upon constructive service, which decree also awarded to her the custody of her minor children, and further alleging that during their married life she had advanced to the defendant from her separate estate $2,000 in money; and she prays that ■the Kentucky decree he affirmed, and that the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Herndon v. Hammond, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Morrison v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Jeter v. District Court of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. State Ex Rel. Mose v. District Court of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Jackson v. HaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Farmer v. SanfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API