Legal Opinion
Riina v. Baum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Mount Pleasant, dated February 8, 2001, which, after a hearing, granted the application of the respondent Roc-Bonnie Associates, Inc., for two area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered October 15, 2001, which confirmed the determination and dismissed the proceeding.
*666Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the prior application by the respondent Roc-Bonnie…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- De Sena v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Village of Tarrytown v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. LamarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Moore v. Town of Islip Zoning Board of AppealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hunt v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. Village of MalverneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Kam Lee v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Putnam ValleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003