Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Reynolds

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1939No. 8693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, Judge:

The defendants, E. B. Reynolds and Mary R. Reynolds, prosecute this writ of error to a judgment of the circuit court of Mineral County overruling their motion to set aside a default judgment and permit the filing of a demurrer to plaintiff’s notice of motion for judgment.

The plaintiff, George S. Arnold, Receiver of the First National Bank of Keyser, caused a notice of motion for judgment on a note in the principal amount of $700.00 to be served on the defendants, returnable August 4, 1937, at the July term of the circuit court. To it the statutory affidavit of claim was attached.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Post v. CarrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Robinson v. BraidenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Stannard Supply Co. v. Delmar Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Willson v. IceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. First National Bank v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plumley v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Winona National Bank v. FridleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Baker v. GaskinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Reed v. HigginbothamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API