Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Boucher

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 28, 1987No. 5404Published

1DissentDaly, J.

The question before us is whether the parking lot, where the defendant was arrested, is “open to public use,” thus bringing the lot within the meaning of General Statutes § 14-227a (a). The role of the courts in cases of statutory construction is limited and, as the majority correctly stated, “we cannot read provisions into legislation.” The legislative history and related statutes, however, help eliminate any ambiguity in the statute. Accordingly, I dissent.

*649“It is basic, of course, that a statute is to be construed as a whole and that the words used therein must be interpreted in their plain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. Zone Book, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API