Legal Opinion

Admire Bank & Trust v. City of Emporia

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1992No. 66,655PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This dispute arises out of a party wall demolition. The parties do not discuss whether there was or is a party wall agreement or a right by prescription.

The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant, City of Emporia (City), and against the plaintiff, Admire Bank & Trust (Bank). Judgment was granted on the basis that the statute of limitations had run.

The trial court should have considered the motion for judgment on the pleadings as a motion for summary judgment. Thus, the issue becomes whether the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Pancake House, Inc. v. Redmond Ex Rel. RedmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Gilger v. Lee Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,215 Charles G. Koch v. Shell Oil Company and Feed Specialties Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API