Admire Bank & Trust v. City of Emporia
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
This dispute arises out of a party wall demolition. The parties do not discuss whether there was or is a party wall agreement or a right by prescription.
The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant, City of Emporia (City), and against the plaintiff, Admire Bank & Trust (Bank). Judgment was granted on the basis that the statute of limitations had run.
The trial court should have considered the motion for judgment on the pleadings as a motion for summary judgment. Thus, the issue becomes whether the trial court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Pancake House, Inc. v. Redmond Ex Rel. RedmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Gilger v. Lee Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,215 Charles G. Koch v. Shell Oil Company and Feed Specialties Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.