Legal Opinion
Katz v. Zuckermann
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leon A. Beerman, J.
Defendant moves for an order granting summary judgment and dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint upon the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action as the agreements asserted by plaintiffs in the complaint are void, illegal and contrary to public policy.
Plaintiffs oppose the application contending that the agreements between plaintiffs and defendant are valid and legal, and alternatively, even if the agreements are illegal and void, that plaintiffs are entitled to damages for unjust enrichment.
Plaintiffs’ first cause of action alleges that in or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- United Calendar Manufacturing Corp. v. HuangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Practice Management, Ltd. v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Gorman v. GrodenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- PRACTICE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. v. BitetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Empire Magnetic Imaging, Inc. v. Comprehensive Care of New York, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000