Legal Opinion
Verdin v. ENSCO Offshore Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided June 28, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-0580PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
MELANCON, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by third-party plaintiff ENSCO Offshore Company (“EN-SCO”) and third-party defendant Centin, LLC (“Centin”). For the following reasons, ENSCO’s motion will be denied and Centin’s motion will be granted.
I. Background
The instant motions are the result of plaintiff Jesse Verdin’s demand for relief from ENSCO for injuries he allegedly sustained while working for Centin on a construction project to refurbish ENSCO 23, a self-contained fixed platform rig designed to drill and complete oil and gas…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. Francis Drilling Fluids, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009