Legal Opinion
Waterman v. Armstrong
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1981No. CA 18224, SC 27691PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
One of the plaintiffs, Sumiko M. Waterman, is the former wife of the defendant, Robert G. Armstrong. Their marriage was dissolved by court decree in September, 1975. The other plaintiff, Max O. Armstrong, is the son of Sumiko M. Waterman and Robert G. Armstrong. At the time of the dissolution Max O. Armstrong was 14 years of age and was suffering from a terminal illness.
In September, 1979, when the son was 18 years of age, the mother and son filed their amended complaint in this case against the father seeking specific performance of the following paragraph of a property settlement agreement:
“…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buswell v. BuswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Jackman v. ShortOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Barber v. International Co. of MexicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Mack v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Carothers v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In re Marriage of BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In re BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- In re the Marriage of BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.